after such a - way too long - post i realize i forgot to include a link to some hilarious philosophical humor (well, probably just for me and a couple other strange book-loving people :P).
http://consc.net/phil-humor.html
i'm specifically talkin' about the proofs of p, they're really great, sooo funny.
an example:
Goodman:
Zabludowski has insinuated that my thesis that p is false, on the basis of alleged counterexamples. But these so- called "counterexamples" depend on construing my thesis that p in a way that it was obviously not intended -- for I intended my thesis to have no counterexamples. Therefore p.
see you all,
fedde
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten